122 Countries Overcome U.S. Opposition and Pass Landmark U.N. Global Treaty to Ban Nuclear Weapons

Black Soul Science > Blog Posts  > 122 Countries Overcome U.S. Opposition and Pass Landmark U.N. Global Treaty to Ban Nuclear Weapons

28 Comments

  • Donald Grant
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    Oh good the global threat of mutual destruction is off the table. So we can get back to massive army battling it out, bombing cities into rubble then catching them on fire and an invading army raping, raping, raping, pillaging and burning. Couldn't you just see Russia and Chinese troupes putting up with BLM or antifa. They would just shoot them down in the streets. Of course the enemy would have all records of the gay marriages and go get gays and kill them just for the fun. And the best part is the winner gets to say who the war criminals are. Now I see a lot of positive attitudes about this, but I know I'm right what the out come of this.

  • Miah Leissa
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    This vote is fantastic. I wish the U. S. would agree to disarm, as well, as should every other country that has them. wow. Just think. The world could EXhale a bit, relax a bit. It would be wonderful. I have NO idea whatsoever why the U. S. feels the need to BUILD our military power when we already have more than all other countries combined. It's sick. All that money COULD be put into education! research! health care! The world would be a much better place for all and so would our country.

  • Ann McKenna
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    Funny how the boycott countries with all the nuclear weapons are the same gang pushing the Paris Climate Agreement. If our planet was truly at risk then wouldn't they all be using the billions spent on weapons warfare and invasions to save the planet????? So what good are weapons if we are all doomed?.?? I smell bullshit

  • Games and Guns
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    What happens when someone says fuck your treaty and launches nukes at you.

  • Truth Bound
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    thankyou women of the world

  • davke
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am
  • Ian h
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    This is great!!!

  • You_Don't_ Know_Me
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    fucking countries jealous because they couldnt afford to have nuclear weapons…

  • Rude Man
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    fuck ya!
    stupid showed his ugly orange face and the world said,
    " NO! You will not hurt any one with nukes, this is not a game"

  • Caged
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    To quote Trump: "Why can't we use nukes?"

  • Caged
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    Trump will no doubt find a way around this.

  • Voodoo Romeo 87
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    less than 5 min. with her? are you kidding me. the most dangerous and important thing on the planet. come on Amy, really.

  • Dina TS-7
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    It would be great to have a list of the countries that agreed to the treaty. Then I can do my best to support them, by spending my money on their exports.

  • James Oatway
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    I love the way you included a fast-bite of who's involved in producing Democracy Now!. Very much like reading the credits of Whose Line is it Anyway. – and on a serious note, thank you for this coverage.

  • Gary Sarela
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    This is the best news so far this year. We need to put the pressure on countries holding out against the ban. Going to take some time, but sanity will prevail.

  • J Calhoun
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    Another bit of posturing by the United Nothing.

  • Steve Winsor
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    AWESOME. YEP. PEACE OUT

  • renocoolify
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    yeah, I don't see the significance. Plus if you wanna be taken seriously, consider taking that ring out your head.

  • Barry Allard
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    Murcia: Nuclear outlaw. 🏍 ⚛️ 🇺🇸

  • GREG SANSENBACH
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    THEIR IS PEACE ON EARTH THAT IS NOT GOOD THEIR ARE SOULS FROM THER BLOOD SHED ALL OVER THE EARTH WHAT IS GOOD TO GOD WHOS RIGHT HE HEARS SEES HS SON JESUS EVAN FROM THE FIRST GENERATION OF LIE LUST KILLING HS BROTHER WHO WILL GOD SAVE IN CURUPTION SEPERATED FROM GODS KINGDOM ON EARTH WHO IS SANCTIFIED BY HIS WORD STRONG ENOUGH IN HIS WORK TO SPEAK  TO HIM JESUS

  • Apogee 711
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    🍻❤️✌🏽️

  • Asheville Flytraps
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    negosiations!?

  • Izzy So
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    Hahahaha Clowns Nuclear weapons will not go away………

  • Lobos222
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    People clap… while being ignorant of two things. The vote means nothing, which is why the major players just boycotted rather than veto. Secondly, a modified version of such a treaty might get major powers support if it allows nuclear nations to use it as leverage against other nations that PLAN to get nuclear weapons. As in, with modification it can be used to pressure Iran to signing it. Result, they dont sign. Iran has plans on getting nuclear weapons and we must stop them before they do. If they do sign it, but break it later. You suddenly have a VALID United Nation reason backed up by law to invade!

    Tbh I wouldnt mind seeing such a treaty. Basically every major nation support it because it exclusively gives them access to nuclear weapons. Both "oppositional" major players in the world already have them. With the decrease of other players being able to attain them without risking the "world" invading them and toppling their leaderships. It might in turn mean that the major powers might reduce their nuclear weapons numbers. Assuming anti nuclear ICBM interception tech doesnt become too good. Which would mean more nuclear weapons or decoys to overwhelm the defenses, but that doesnt look to be the case. Currently its close to impossible to just intercept one warhead that doesnt even have on board type counter measures.

  • CalGoldDredger
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    PEACE FOR ALL

  • trinhcuong 1964
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    we should ban any exploition to kill human over 10 yard wide n deep too, period.

  • TheByzantineBeserker
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    Is there any way to enforce this?

  • Rosalvo Bobo
    October 15, 2017 at 10:49 am

    Cute idea but Russia has 10,000, nukes, China has 9000 and Us has 6000… Israel propabley has at least 1000, india and Pakistan each has at minimum 10 between themselves… and Trump, Putin and Ping Ping are those at the helm of power, who will be the first of them to decrease their nuclear stockpiles? Surely it would have to be Us and Russia who can bring their collective nukes down to Chinas level.. It would have to be insentivised as a race, a competition because we know humans are only good at working for a reward, we would reward the country who gets rid of nukes first with a very important deal of some sort…but when you take into consideration the greediness and deceptive nature of humans, i wouldn't be suprised if Ping Ping and Trump decide to get one over on Putin or the other way around, to hide a couple nukes in the country in neutral Alaska just in case China hid one themselves.. With these kinds of things there is no certifiable method of knowing if all nuclear weapons are destroyed because by way of deception we will always fear deception of others and decide to prepare by hiding our weapons ourselves..

    I wouldn't be surprised if they come up with a scheme to weaponize the earth with nuclear weapons ,just so they can have the ability to keep theirs.. This is the result of centuries of warfare and mass industrialized warfare and pure focus on the militarization of earth as opposed to the collective global emancipation of the evils of earth, we should have been building a nuclear bomb of intelligence, love and human compassion not one that can murder 100,000 Japanese children in one shot… How can you even began to talk about banning nuclear weapons when you know the incentive for countries who are Bullied by USA and its Cronies like; Israel,Japan and Yemen is to develop a safety mechanism of equal stature to the American nuclear defenses to protect their own homeland from further imperial encroachment, How do you tell India to stop nuclear weapons when they see Pakistan developing their own under the guise of protecting their country which has a dangerous history with its nuclear neighbor India, you cant… Thats like telling a dog not to bark when it sees danger… Humans have the fight or flight syndrome associated with Adrenalin rush and this comes from histories of having to defend ourselves against outward danger… This has not dissipated, the fight or flight is now mechanised into aviation militarized vehicles capable of monitoring air space and holding a nuclear weapon capable of destroying entire cities.. in the atmosphere of two world wars, lingering resentment, tribal, religious linguistic and historical animosity, we are in dangers times for a clear war and the fuses only need to be lit once.